Totally debatable. I get asked this a lot, and while the question, I find, is occasionally posed from a budget or lifestyle perspective (i.e. allergies), it is a valid question when it comes to achieving a successful space.
Going without is not wrong. But the look itself is most often at home in rooms with a European aesthetic. Sometimes, too, "clean country", as I like to think of it, is a look that can carry off no-rug appeal, without looking half-dressed. Both aesthetics lend themselves to a look that says, "I'm a room that's still being collected, and don't I look great while I await more treasures?" And the look works, and it is just that -- a look.
Each of the rooms below were done without a rug because that was the designer's intent. They make a statement. Confident. Anything but ordinary. Stylish. If you were designing these rooms, would you have been bold enough
not to use a rug?
 |
| Designer: Eddie Ross |
 |
| Designer: Leslie Klots |
 |
| Designer: Martha Angus |
Imagine a rug in either room, above or below. Yes, they would look fine with one. But without, they have an intentional, successful edge...
 |
| Designer: Martha Angus |
 |
| Source: House Beautiful. Chairs: Steven Gambrel |
So, what do you think? I know you're out there reading, because I see the statistics every day! Please do me the favor of clicking on "comments" in the gray bar below each post, and share your thoughts from time to time. It's fun for readers to learn what others are thinking. Many thanks, in advance :).
Talk to you soon,
Carol